3.7.2003 Because semiconductors in current SSTC must works
up to its limits (1,2 MHz) I decided to wound a new bigger TC with lower resonant frequency. For this purpose I obtained
43 cm piece of PVC pipe, 6,3 cm diameter, and relative thin wire CuL 0,2 mm (I bought it as 1500m spool).
I calculated that I will need about 380 m of wire at 2000 turns. This is quite enough turns to make it by hand. Especially with this
thin wire which tends to tangle up and breaks. So I take a think :) and built improvised winding machine from a driller.
To hold the pipe in place I used two coffee bottles with proper outer diameter. One bottle was tight pushed into one end
of pipe and carried turning moment. I drilled a hole in the center of its cap and mount a screw there which I fix in the
driller's chuck. Second bottle was used as sleeve bearing on the other end of pipe. All this things I supported by various
kind of lumber under hand and weighted with plaster bag. The driller have thyristor regulator inside but lowest rotation
speed seems to me still too big. So I used my variac and it works fine. Then I fixed spool with wire and started
At the first time it doesn't wind too easily and after few tens of turns wire jumped out of
the track. It means that I must stop and unwound some turns back and start again. But after 1/3 of winding I got it in
my hands and wounded remaining 2/3 quickly. All winding takes me about 3/4 hour. Then I started with varnishing. I didn't
used resin in alcohol after my previous problems but I bought an acrylic (clear) paint spray. I sprayed on the winding
with multiple layers to get it thick enough. It was not cheap but there's a lot of advantages - fast drying, higher mechanical
and chemical resistance...
At the beginning I was planning to use this TC with SSTC/VTTC driver only. This mean that I
need great primary to secondary coupling. So I wounded primary coil on 11,2 cm PVC pipe with 13,75 turns. After my previous
experiences with curving a thick copper wire (which is overdesigned for my small TC but looks cool ;-) I decided to choose
something thinner-insulated 2mm wire. I tried to make some spacing to prevent turn to turn touching. At the bottom of pipe
I wounded feedback coil with 16 turns and 2-trun and 8-turn taps. Here are winding data details.
I varnished primary coil to fix the wire too. The bottom base is made of plexiglass (my favorite material). And here are
all my TCs:
17.7.2003 Tuning: I didn't calculate fres first (later
I calculated that it should be ~370 kHz). My estimation was around 0,5 MHz. To do needed calculations easier
I wrote a simple electro & TC calculator in PHP.
Now it's time to measure it. I thought that connecting to my working bipolar transistor flyback would
be the easiest way. Then I would read frequency of generated elmag. field on my frequency counter. But that was a mistake.
For some reason the flyback driver oscillate somewhere around 800 kHz. After swapping feedback coil terminals it changed to
about 320 kHz. And then let's make a choice. In both cases the sparks was very poor-worse than with old TC.
When I have started to study causes of this effect I discovered that Tesla Coil is more
complex device than I had thought. For measuring fres is needed to connect source of driving signal to the base of
secondary coil via serial resistor, (other generator terminal must be grounded) and leave secondary top free in air as
shown in right side schematics. This mean don't connect generator directly to both end of the coil. Secondary coil is
not insulated system but it's capacitive coupled to surroundings. Sine wave generator is useful for this measurement
but 50% duty cycle square wave TTL generator may be used too. Problem of square wave signal is that its spectrum contains
a lot of odd harmonics. Then it may happen that our TC with fres=300 kHz is excited not only by 300 kHz square
wave signal but 100 kHz too due to 3rd harmonic.
For coarse estimation of fres we only need some square wave generator with sharp edges
(duty cycle is not important). We set few kHz or tens of kHz at the generator and watching for signal edges on oscilloscope.
A ringing should be seen at rising and falling edges of square wave. We estimate fres as frequency of this ringing.
After time zooming it may looks like this:
This is called a transient response of system. To refinement our fres we tune generator around this estimated fres (now we should
have 50% duty cycle) and seeking for signal maximum.
If we have a sine wave generator (I have only my terrible R-C Wienn bastle which is very
unstable while tuning) we only need to tune frequency up from around 100 kHz (for small an middle TCs) and watch voltage
on sense resistor (I used 100 kohm) on oscilloscope. The first voltage maximum matches our fres. If we tune to higher
frequencies we surprisingly find other less strong maximums. This higher maximums are higher resonant modes, not harmonics.
They are not integer multiples of basic (fundamental) resonating frequency fres. I try to explain their meaning at next drawing:
For example a guitar string may oscillate that it have one maximum in the middle and two minimums at its fixed ends.
But it may also oscillate that it would have two maximums - 1st at 1/4, 2nd at 3/4 of length and three minimums - at 1/2 of
length and at both ends. In the first case the string evoke one half of sine wave - lambda/2 and two halves of sine wave -
one lambda in second case. Lambda/2 is fundamental mode for a string. But Tesla Coil resembles rather to whistle with one
open end an other closed end. At the closed end is minimum and at the open end is maximum. This is a quarter of wave.
So fundamental mode is lambda/4. In our case we are watching for voltage distribution along the coil. This can be done
quite easily on running TC. We simply move small glowing tube or needle spike along the secondary coil winding at constant
distance and watch for maximum glowing/corona which shows us voltage maximum. Fundamental mode means smooth voltage rise
from the coil base with maximum on its top. Consequently highest voltage and sparks length.
When TC is excited at higher resonant mode problems may occur. Turn-to-turn breakout may
occured in voltage maximums when more power is fed to TC. Where is voltage maximum there is current minimum and where
is voltage minimum there is current maximum. Current maximums may melt thin wire at higher input power. So it's recommended
to check what is the current resonating mode before applying full power to new TC.
Then frequency response may looks like this (fres = 94,5 kHz; frequencies of higher modes are
not integer multiples of fundamental frequency):
Till now we think over independent secondary coil. After we attach the primary coil it
becomes much more complicated. There will arise two magnetically coupled resonant circuits. Some theory about resonant
circuits is here and
here. To simplify it we would
expect the both fres are the same. Shape of the frequency response of its mutual impedance (Zt = U2/I1) is
expressively affected by coupling factor k and quality factor Q. More accurately on value of k*Q expression. Coupling
factor is a number from <0..1> range. Simple it says how much the change in 1st resonant circuit affects the 2nd resonant circuit. When k is
great then coupling is more tight. We can estimate it from geometrical coils setup. When the windings are closely together
and more turns of both winding overlays then the k is greater. For SSTC/VTTC is recommended to use tight coupling.
But it's needed to beware flashovers. Q is quality factor of both resonant circuits, Q = sqrt(Q1*Q2) - geometrical
average of partial quality factors. Q of parallel resonant circuit is generally determined by reactive component X and
resistive (lossy) component R ratio. Most TCs reaches (unloaded) Q factor in range of 50 - 100. When k*Q<1, it's subcritical
coupling. Frequency response has one flat maximum. When k*Q = 1, it's critical coupling. There is still one maximum but
most sharp (lowest bandwidth). And when k*Q>1, it's supercritical coupling with two maximums on Zt curve and drop between:
In my case I measured secondary coil fres at 333 kHz. According to measured primary inductance I chose capacitor's value
to resonate at 333 kHz too. Then I measured it again (with generator connected to both primary coil terminals via resistor).
I found two maximums at f- = 283 kHz and f+ = 410 kHz with anything between. From this two
frequencies the k may be calculated by equation: k = (f0/f-)2 - 1 or k = 1 - (f0/f+)2.
If both values differ it means that resonating circuits are not accurately tuned to the same frequency. I calculated
k = 0,36. All this measurements I made with low level signals from generator. It may considerable change
in real operation with high power inputs. Due to sparks and air ionization the strength of capacitive coupling to
surroundings will change.
I found useful program MANDK from Mark S. Rzeszotarski on the Internet.
It can calculate primary and secondary coils inductances, capacitances, fres, Q and coupling factor k depending on mechanical
shift between primary and secondary coil. In my case the results are accurate pretty well. Attention! All dimensions must be
entered in inches (1" = 2,54 cm).
It's seen that TC is a very complex device dependent on a lot of variables. Till now there's
probably not discovered a perfect model which would describes all its effects. So I wait how TC will furthermore surprise me...
6.10.2005 As I wrote
before in VTTC section, the impedance matching is very important.
I made a bit more detailed measurement today. The goal is to get a rough idea how the impedance and
Q-factor of TC depends on amount of sparks flashing from it's secondary.
The MANDK program calculates Q0 (of unloaded secondary) too high - about
110 for my BigTC. I measured Q ~ 60 using frequency generator and scope. That's because MANDK doesn't
include dielectric losses in secondary form. But this is just beginning... Once sparks break out
from secondary further Q-factor decrease will occur. We can imagine that discharge like a capacitive-resistive
load connected between top of the secondary and ground. Capacitive component detune our secondary to
lower frequency (discharge is conductive plasma, it has similar effect like placing a metal toroid on top).
Resistive component damps the resonant circuit (most of energy in discharge turns to heat like in resistor)
which cause lowering its impedance. Of course it's reflected on primary side and if impedance drops under
value of output impedance of driving supply the power transfer to TC drops too. And the driver become overloaded
by larger current (which we can see eg. like red glowing plate of vacuum tube or popping MOSFETs :).
From measured operational Q-factor we can simple calculate or estimate
the optimal primary inductance and tank capacity to match the giver driver. If the driver have output
impedance Ri it should equal to operational impedance on primary side of TC, Zpri = Ri. When tuned
to resonance, XL = XC = Zpri/Q, now we can get the inductance and capacity from reactances.
We are working with estimation so it's good idea to make a little bit more turns and some taps on primary
and try it.
The measurement was done on my BigTC powered by SSTC IGBT halfbridge
with filtered power Vdd supply (220 + 390 µF). The RF current was measured via two
low-inductance 0,5 ohm resistors in parallel by my 2-channel scope
Grundig MO 52.
Incoming power of whole SSTC was measured by Metex multimeter M-3860M with TrueRMS. In tables are written
peak values which I recalculated via shapes to RMS values for further calculations.
In 1st table the TC primary is connected directly to SSTC driver
with spike on secondary. So discharge break out immediately, for whole measure (about 1,5 - 5 cm long).
In 2nd table is the same circuit but I placed a small metal ball on the spike. So discharge did break
out later with more power. See the discontinuity in graph.
In 3rd table the TC primary is connected via serial resonant capacitor 12,3 nF / 4,5 kV
as DRSSTC. On the secondary is only the spike so it sparks immediately:
24.12.2008 I made new secondary top design - I added
new discharge terminal and toroid.
updated at 11:57; 16.4.2009
„Kdo má tak málo fantazie, že své lži musí opírat o důkazy, měl by raději rovnou mluvit pravdu.“ Oscar Wilde